Why is the level of scientific uncertainty in the sciences of physical and mental phenomena not different?

It turns out that it is still not so easy to approach the mechanism of what "hands" or "hooks" matter, field and waves coming from two particles are hooked in such a way that the mechanical movement of particles and matter begins. That's why the kids won't understand. Children who are not spoiled by habits and patterns coming from various sciences penetrate deeper into the connections of phenomena and are therefore able to ask paradoxical questions.
The existence of these "hooks" on a qualitative level was suggested by the ancient philosopher Democritus. Alas, there are still no hypotheses about this in theoretical physics!
Maxwell's formulaic reductionism does not describe the mechanisms of these "hooks" of interaction between fields, waves, and matter. It describes only the sequence of processes of matter and field, but without reaching the final mechanism of the deep and secret "hooks" of matter, field and waves.
What are the underlying mechanisms of the "hooks" of matter and the "hooks" of the gravitational and electromagnetic fields? What exactly is pulling or pushing at the deepest level of matter?
In order to get close and at least begin to reason about this correctly, it is necessary to know some aspects of the philosophy and cognitive science of physics. For example, the philosophy and cognitive science of the Phenomenon of Force, which we can only observe and describe using physical formulas, without revealing the mechanisms of the "hooks" of matter, fields and waves.  Democritus would most likely have been satisfied with the discovery of physical fields and waves, which he did not know about in his ancient era.
It is necessary to get into the cognitive science and philosophy of physics. Only then can we stop going around in circles, getting out of those calluses in our brains caused by the classics of physics. It is necessary to delve deeply into the philosophy and cognitive science of the principles of short-range and long-range action.
It must be remembered that when, thanks to Einstein, an Observer appeared in physical models, and also, thanks to Heisenberg, the principle of non-parallelism appeared, this was the beginning of the end of the natural scientific greatness of the sciences. And it became clear that there is a level of ambiguity not only in the science of the mechanisms of occurrence of the phenomenon of a mental phenomenon, but also a physical phenomenon. I carry out the above analyses and statements in a large literary review of my upcoming scientific monograph on the theory of subjective reality generation, the theory of the brain's existome.

Associate Professor of KFU, Candidate of Psychological Sciences, nominee of the State Prize in Science and Technology of the Republic of Tatarstan, Ramil Garifullin