How do social networks allow us to form objective ideas about coronavirus and vaccination against it?

Pay attention to the fact that most of us criticizing someone's opinion about the negative prospect of lowering natural immunity with the help of covid vaccines, do not give any counter-arguments, without showing logic. Facebook is filled with such emotional appraisers. Some posts have long been a zone of detente for people who do not know how to think, reason, and make arguments.

And for correctness in the future, some authors of posts, it is better to give their versions that criticize scientists about the coronavirus, also give links to other scientists who also criticize these scientists like himself. This will be more convincing. I am sure that there are already many articles, opinions and works that support his opinion. And even after that, you need to be prepared for the fact that appraisers will appear again, who will begin to glue negative labels against you without any counter-arguments.

There are enough of these victims of propaganda and propagandists of the federal media in social networks. As always, I sympathize with the will and patience of some well-known bloggers because, according to my analysis, many of their colleagues are sometimes not able to show a sufficient level of intelligence that some bloggers show in social networks. Most well-known bloggers are incompetent in intellectual terms and only bathe like idiots in the "rays of their glory". By the way, many of them have turned into propagandists of the federal media and various fraudulent financial structures. And this is terrible!

In general, statistically, Russians who have a more objective and critical opinion about vaccination are still in the majority. And they are not just phobics, but are capable of analyzing and understanding the true picture. They draw conclusions not on the basis of federal propaganda, but on the basis of their logic and discussion in social networks, in particular, on Telegram channels. Social networks, for some time now, have begun to allow making more objective conclusions. Therefore, I refer to the book "The psychology of manipulation around the coronavirus" (2020) to strengthen the counter-arguments.

See the video channel "Psychologist Ramil Garifullin"

Associate Professor of the Institute of Psychology and Education of KFU, Candidate of Psychological Sciences Ramil Garifullin.