All these are quotes from an open letter from doctors in Belgium, which made an impression both on health care institutions in the country and abroad. The appeal of Belgian doctors, addressed not only to fellow citizens, but also to the entire world community, appeared on the website DOCS 4 Open Debate ("Doctors for open debate"), it was created specifically for the publication of this document.
To date, the document has been signed by more than 500 doctors, almost two thousand medical staff and about 18,000 Belgians.
And what is the reaction of humanity, scientists and leading experts to this?
Almost no serious publications and reasoned interviews and objective analysis with counterarguments against the treatment of these 500 doctors and scientists were published. Are these 500 Belgian doctors right? In General, the inhabitants of our planet, intimidated by the coronavirus, may no longer want to hear objective information.
But we can definitely say that the world's leading politicians did everything to ignore this letter from 500 Belgian doctors.
Authoritative experts around the world are either weak and do not understand the situation, or are caught in the grip of political pressure. For example, in Russia, doctors and doctors are prohibited from making comments about covid , without the permission of the Ministry of health of the Russian Federation.
Why was there no worldwide scientific discussion of the letters of these 500 Belgian doctors? The answer is simple: it is not profitable for someone.
And now, I will present some provisions of the letter of these 500 Belgian doctors and scientists:
1. the use of a non-specific PCR test, which gives many false positive results, gave a picture of an exponential increase in the number of cases. The tests were carried out on an emergency basis and were never subjected to serious self-testing. The Creator of the test explicitly warned that it is intended for research, not for diagnostics.
2. the PCR Test works with cycles of amplification of genetic material — each time a piece of the genome is amplified. Any infection (for example, with other viruses, remnants of old viral genomes) can lead to false positive results. The test does not measure how many viruses are present in the sample. A real viral infection means the mass presence of viruses, the so-called viral load.
3. If someone tests positive, it doesn't mean that they are actually clinically infected, sick, or about to get sick. Koch's postulate is not fulfilled ("a Pure agent found in a patient with complaints can cause the same complaints in a healthy person").
4. Since a positive PCR result does not automatically indicate an active infection or contagion, this does not justify measures based solely on these tests.
The death rate was many times lower than expected and close to the death rate from regular seasonal flu (0.2%).
5. Therefore, the number of registered deaths from the "crown" looks overstated. There is a difference between death from the " crown "and death"with the crown". People often carry multiple viruses and potentially pathogenic bacteria at the same time.
6. We can clearly identify the most vulnerable groups. The vast majority of patients who died were aged 80 or older. The majority (70%) of those who died before the age of 70 had an underlying medical condition, such as heart disease, diabetes, chronic lung disease, or obesity. The vast majority of those infected (> 98%) did not get sick or almost did not get sick or were cured spontaneously.
7. We are shocked that the government refers to health as the reason for the state of emergency.
8. as doctors and health professionals, in the face of a virus that is close to seasonal flu in terms of harmfulness, mortality, and contagion, we can only reject these highly disproportionate measures.
9. We therefore demand the immediate termination of all measures taken. We question the legitimacy of the current expert consultants who confer behind closed doors.
I read a great letter from the Belgian of doctors.
In essence, this is a retelling of my scientific monograph, published by me in the spring. Of course, this is not plagiarism. And I'm not making any claims. I am glad that these Belgian doctors have matured and made the same conclusions that I made in the spring.
I am grateful for the support of my monograph by such media as Echo of Moscow, Psi-factor, Arguments of the Week, SecurityLab.ru etc. It was a lot of work. And in may, this monograph of mine was published . Let the Belgian doctors did it late and there is no novelty in this letter. The world is coming to the truth!
( see my monograph R. R. Garifullin " Psychology of manipulation around the coronavirus. SARS as a weapon of world economic war:
Professor of the Institute of psychology and education of KFU, candidate of psychological Sciences Ramil Garifullin